![git merge master into branch git merge master into branch](https://blog.seibert-media.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Git-Branches-1.png)
(In particular, the fetch step run by pull brings over only origin/master, and it does not update the ref in your repo:1 any new commits winds up referred-to only by the special FETCH_HEAD reference. So this is almost the same as doing the two steps by hand, but there are some subtle differences that probably are not too concerning to you. You can also rename the dev branch to something old and then make a new branch from master with the same name: git branch. The pull command instructs git to run git fetch, and then the moral equivalent of git merge origin/master. Warning: This will break the history of the branch for people who cloned it before Then, other people will have to do a git pull -rebase on the devbranch to get the changes. You can insert -no-ff or -ff-only to prevent a fast-forward, or merge only if the result is a fast-forward if you like. Once you make changes in the local repository and ready to share it with your team members, then execute git push. The command is used to combine two branches and also to merge multiple commits into one history. Sometimes this is only useful for Warm Fuzzy Feelings ("ah, yes, that is in fact what I want") and sometimes it is useful for changing strategies entirely ("whoa, I don't want THAT stuff yet").įinally, the merge command takes the given commit, which you can name as origin/master, and does whatever it takes to bring in that commit and its ancestors, to whatever branch you are on when you run the merge. Rebase vs Merge When you do rebase a feature branch onto master, you move the base of the feature branch to master branchs ending point. The git merge command integrates the independent lines of development into a single branch.
![git merge master into branch git merge master into branch](https://i.stack.imgur.com/8nCfo.png)
They get traced to your repository, but named origin/branch for any branch named branch on the remote.Īt this point, you can use any viewer like git log, gitk, etc to see "what they have" that you don't, and vice versa. The named remote (origin) and says to it: "gimme everything you have that I don't", i.e., all commits on all branches. The last thing to check before actually starting the merge process is our current HEAD branch: we need to make sure that we've checked out the. If properly configured, a plain 'git pull' should suffice (after making 'master' our active branch): git checkout master git pull. The fetch command can be done at any point before the merge, i.e., you can swap the order of the fetch and the checkout, because fetch just goes over to We must update 'master' before we can integrate our own changes. Instead, create a bugfix branch with the name of the issue key (e.g.
#GIT MERGE MASTER INTO BRANCH SOFTWARE#
Git fetch origin # gets you up to date with the origin Current approach at K15t Software Dont commit fixes directly to the master. Git checkout dmgr2 # you have reached and are currently into " branch dmgr2" ago It is necessary in cases where master has changes that impact the feature work. The steps you listed will work, but there's a long way that gives you more options: Then all work is done in a feature branch, and if its too long and master changes between when work starts and the changes get merged back into master, then master gets rebased onto the feature branch to preserve a linear history.